LeAnn Rimes and Brandi Glanville Face Off

leannrimes1I’ve been following this story for quite some time now and I’m certain that there are many, many layers that I haven’t been privyed to. As such, it is hard to ascertain the true problem here. I have so many questions. Is LeAnn really disallowing Eddie to co-parent with his ex-wife, Brandi; or is Brandi just throwing out accusations as the jealous, bitter ex-wife? Why is Brandi blaming LeAnn? She didn’t have babies with her; she had them with Eddie. Isn’t it more of Eddie’s fault for allowing LeAnn to control the situation, if that is indeed the case? He’s a big boy, so why can’t he speak up for himself? Why is the battle between LeAnn and Brandi, while Eddie just lays back in the cut? Oh well, none of us will probably ever get the full story, but check it out below.

This story was first published on www.thecelebritycafe.com.

When the ex-wife of Eddie Cibrian, Brandi Glanville, received word that her son Mason was taken to the ER under LeAnn Rimes’s watch, she was outraged over not being contacted and informed about the incident. “All I know is I didn’t get a phone call. Poor choice. Bad parenting,” Glanville said, according to Perez Hilton.

The homewrecker, who cheated on her husband with Cibrian while Glanville was pregnant with their second child, has been spending time with Cibrian and Glanville’s two sons, Jake, 3, and Mason, 7. Rimes has been co-parenting Glanville’s two sons ever since she and Cibrian publicly announced their affair and divorced from their respective spouses.

“I’m disappointed in their decision. I’m the mother of these two boys and if we’re going to co-parent, we have to do that together,” Glanville said Thursday. “It’s not call me after. [The boys] are not in danger. The only thing that’s in danger is our co-parenting relationship if [LeAnn] keeps involving herself and doesn’t allow [Eddie].”

Cibrian’s ex-wife was furious upon learning of Mason’s hospital visit via Rimes’s Twitter account. However, the country singer disputes Glanville’s allegations, tweeting, “She WAS told. Drama is unavoidable.”

Share

Interview with Deesha Philyaw from Co-Parenting 101

deeshaphilyaw

Deesha Philyaw

I loved chatting with Deesha Philyaw from Co-Parenting 101!  I must admit that when I initially decided to do this interview I thought that we would be on opposite sides of the spectrum regarding co-parenting. After all, she is the one that vacations with her ex-spouse and I have some strong opinions abou that. However, this interview was insightful not because of the information persay, as I already know how beneficial cooperative parenting is for the child; but because I learned that our views aren’t really that different at all. I learned that vacationing with her ex-spouse is the “most extreme” thing that they do for their kids and it works for them. As I’ve always stated, there certainly isn’t a one size fits all approach to co-parenting. Additionally, I learned an important lesson from Ms. Deesha, and that is that it’s most important for divorced parents to talk about a co-parenting plan prior to divorce, if possible, in order to implement a plan that works for them and their children. As Deesha stated during our chatting session; “your experience [she was referring to me and my ex and the fact that we decided to be highly cooperative parents after our breakup] also illustrates Reason #8,487 why people need to really give 100% effort to making these decisions themselves instead of ending up in court: A judge does not know–and likely doesn’t really care about–your child’s personality, needs, quirks, etc. Court is really where you get the one-size-fits-all in effect.”

At any rate, thanks for the chat, Deesha! TMF readers, check it out below.

Kela: Was your co-parenting plan something that you and your ex-spouse agreed about prior to the divorce or did it just sort of happen that way over time? 

Deesha: Our plan was heavily discussed and agreed upon before we even physically separated or called any attorneys.  Mike and I were on the same page about how we would aim for consistency for our 2 daughters, what our parenting time schedule would be, how we would handle holidays and vacations, joint activities, and how, in the future, we would handle the introduction of significant others.  We never explicitly said, “We’re not going to bad-mouth each other in front of the kids”; that was just a given.  We were completely committed to keeping the peace where the kids were considered.  Bad-mouthing the other parent to a child is just bad parenting, period, whether you’re divorcing or not; it’s not something either of us would ever do.  So we didn’t have to articulate that.  And we didn’t articulate anything beyond keeping the peace for the kids’ sake, with regard to how we would interact with each other.  For a long time, we didn’t interact with each other outside of dropping off/picking up kids, and phone calls and emails that were tense and business-like at best, and hostile and ugly at worst.

Time passed, probably two years or so after our separation, and little over a year after our divorce was finalized, and we turned a corner.  I suspect we needed time and space and all the things we did personally and individually to heal.  For me, that included counseling.  Eventually, we both seemed to relax in each other’s presences, and the communication wasn’t tense; we could talk about difficult things and even disagree without it getting ugly.  And from there, in the nearly 6 years since we separated, a friendship has emerged.

 Kela: Vacationing with your ex-spouse is something that I have some very strong opinions about; not because I disagree but because the fact that it’s glamorized sends the wrong message to stepfamilies.  I think the goal of divorced parents should be to co-parent in way that benefits the child and not necessarily aim for vacationing together. The fact of the matter is that each child is different and some children respond negatively to these types of things; i.e., they feel even more torn when mom actually witnesses that he actually likes his stepmom. Having all of their parents sharing in Christmas or Thanksgiving dinner or vacations actually prohibits them from fully engaging in the moment because they are too conscious of who’s looking when he hugs stepmom or stepdad or laughs at their jokes, etc. Do you and your ex-spouse participate in such activities because you think it’s what the kids want or because you actually are friends who just happen to be divorced?

Deesha: From the outset of our separation, when were definitely not friends, we agreed to a joint summer vacation, a combined Christmas, and occasions where we would both take the kids to dinner or some other outing.  Since it’s been a few years now, we’ve checked in with our kids to see if this is something they’re still interested in us doing, and their reaction thus far has been, “Of course!” and they can’t imagine why we wouldn’t.  I suspect, based on other conversations we’ve had with them about the divorce, that they want to continue the joint activities because one of the many things they hate about divorce is being with one of us OR the other.  Joint activities are the rare occasions when they can be with both of us at the same time and we’re not in transition.

Kela: Do you believe your kids would have adjusted well to the divorce had you not decided to vacation together? 

Deesha and Mike - Photo Courtesy of T. Foley

Deesha and Mike - Photo Courtesy of T. Foley

Deesha:

Yes.  There’s so much more than vacationing together that has gone into our post-divorce parenting that has served our children well.  Vacationing together was one of many ideas and efforts we put in place upon our separation.  The vacation stands out because it’s so unusual, but it shouldn’t be mistaken for the cornerstone of our co-parenting.

 

 

 

 

Kela: I read in one of your Faster Times articles that you are now remarried – CONGRATULATIONS! You also said that you and your husband live apart because you didn’t want to move the kids away from their father. 

Deesha: And also because my husband is also divorced with two daughters and a shared parenting agreement, and he too chooses to be in close physical proximity to his children.   

Kela: I don’t think anyone will disagree that marriage takes a whole lot of work! What are some of the things that you and your spouse do to make your marriage work despite the distance between you? 

Deesha: We do practical as well as creative things to make it work.  Practically, our parenting time schedules are aligned.   Even though his schedule is an every-other-week schedule and mine is not, we have our kids the same weekends, so this allows us grown-up time on our “off” weekends (and full weeks during summer, spring, and winter vacations).  We can bring the kids together on the other weekends, though not much at all during the school year, except for long weekends and holidays.  All six of us are together for weeks at a time in the summer and spring.  So logistically speaking, my husband and I are able to see each other a minimum of twice a month, and lots more during summer, spring, and winter vacations. We both have our girls the same Thanksgivings (alternating years), so we’re always all together for Thanksgiving.

As you can probably guess, we have a shared calendar.  Let me just plug Google Calendar real quick: I have a calendar that my husband, my ex, and his wife all access which contains my schedule and my daughters’ schedules.  There’s also a second calendar that overlaps, same interface, that only my husband and I can see, that includes his schedule and his daughters’ schedules. 

Another plug for technology: It helps to keep us connected throughout the day.  We talk, text, and email a lot, about what’s going on with us, with all the kids, in the news, and amongst our friends and family.

Also, we “claim” both households, from a practical standpoint.  My husband might be the only man who has a honey-do list in two states.  Our division of labor tends to be pretty stereotypically gendered, not because we conform to that, but rather because of our skill sets.  For example, I’m perfectly capable of doing manual labor and heavy lifting, but that’s his thing, definitely not mine.  He’s capable of making all doctors and dentist appointments for all six of us and organizing summer camp schedules, but I’m better at those kinds of details, so I do it.

Creatively, there’s a lot that we do.  We focus on our shared interests.  We play Internet Scrabble together, and we read the same books, so that we can talk about them.  We both love to cook, so we share a lot of recipes and plan menus when we’re apart, and cook for each other and with each when we’re together.  We both love to dance, so we try to fit that in when we’re together.  We both try to stay active and healthy, so we encourage each other in our workouts and good eating.  In general, we try to be purposeful about our time together.  Sometimes we’re working or doing housework, but we are very intentional about being close, even when we socialize with friends, in either city.  We also try to keep up with a regular “date” night, even when we’re apart-time where we can just focus on each other.

It’s not always in the budget, but traveling together is another way we connect.  My husband’s job requires him to travel, and he has a fair amount of flexibility as to when he travels, so we try to make the trips align with my schedule, and I can join him, even if just on the tail end of the trip. 

We intentionally work on our marriage, too.  We read books and share articles with each other about marriage, relationships, gender issues, stepfamilies, and parenting.  We try to deal with conflict head on, as the habitual avoidance of conflict has been found to be the #1 predictor of divorce.  Earlier this year, we attended a couples’ retreat that was really transformative for us. 

I asked my husband your question, and he said: “Patience, understanding, and appreciating the compromises and sacrifices we make to fulfill our commitment to each other and to all of our girls.” 

And finally: We laugh.  A LOT.  Humor and playfulness keep us close and help sustain us when we can’t be physically together.

[I realize I wrote "my husband" a lot.  I don't use his real name because of the nature of his job.  "JB" is a pseudonym I use for him when I write, so feel free to substitute that if you'd like.]

Kela: I am also an advocate to showing our children what a healthy marriage looks like instead of solely focusing on what a healthy divorce is. My ex and I and his wife and my husband get along great! However, we don’t want to only show our children how great we can co-parent. We also want to show them what life after divorce is and how to be committed and a partner to your spouse, not just your ex-spouse. Kids live what they learn and our hope is that they will grow up, get married and stay married. So it’s important to show them what that looks like. What are some of the things that you and your spouse do to show them what a healthy marriage is?

Deesha: They see us communicating and being respectful and loving towards each other.  They see us delight in and being accountable to each other in ways that are exclusive to each other.  They see us committing and prioritizing our time and other resources to each other and to our family as a whole.   They see us being responsible, thoughtful parents-well, this they may not grasp until they are parents themselves, but in our parenting we hope to convey to them their worth and our commitment to them, because our marriage vows included our commitments to them.

They see us being partners, whether we’re cleaning the house, planning a birthday party, or playing a board game with them.  We talk about being friends, and this surprises them, but we believe that it shows them what is at the core of a healthy marriage.

Kela: What if your spouse ever said that he was uncomfortable with your co-parenting arrangement? He loves the fact that you guys get along and thinks it’s healthy for the kids but Christmas dinner and vacations with the ex is a bit much for him. What if he preferred that you not participate in such activity with your ex-spouse? Would that be a deal breaker for you?

familychristmasDeesha: To clarify, we spend Christmas Eve all together (not my husband and stepkids though, because we’re in different states) and at least part of Christmas Day.  Some years, we’ve gone different places in the afternoon/evening.  Last year, I stayed at Mike and Sherry’s house until after dinner time.

It’s so hard to conjecture, but I would have to say that I might have given up the vacation and Christmas Eve, but probably not Christmas Day, opening gifts together.  It really would depend on what his reasoning was for being uncomfortable, and I’d have to balance that against what I perceived my kids’ needs (which are ever-changing) to be at that time.  This issue would have come up long before we got to the point of talking marriage, so in essence, we both would have had a decision to make, even to continue the dating relationship: If he decided this was a deal-breaker for him, I’d have to look at what my kids’ needs were at that time; we could be at a very different place when they are older (they are now almost-7 and almost-12).  And he would have to decide as well if the situation was so uncomfortable to him that, in the face of it, he didn’t want to marry me.  If that was the case, if it was that big to him, then probably this issue would likely be masking other reasons why we probably shouldn’t have married, at least not at that time.  Is it a trust issue? A confidence issue?  Is it just the principle of the thing?  Regardless of the specific reason, I don’t think he’d be wrong, and I’d be right.  Or vice versa.  In general, in relationships people have to make choices that work for them.

Kela: Do/Did you choose someone because he was the perfect guy for you or because he is/was comfortable with your arrangement? 

Deesha: When I was first dating again, Mike and I were not friends, but we did one vacation together with the girls once before I met my now-husband, and we spent one Christmas with the girls, in that same time frame (I met him in early December of the following year).  It never occurred to me to disclose these details up front to anyone I was dating because I was taking things slowly and dating casually; I would, however, mention that my ex and I were cooperative for our kids’ sake, and guys would be relieved because that meant “no drama.”  However, if it did come up in conversation about my kids that their dad lived right around the corner (which, at the time, he did), that was a problem for a couple of guys.  They assumed this meant that one or both of us still had “a thing” for each other, or was secretly driving past each other’s house spying-I’ve talked to Mike about this, and neither was the case, lol.  I can understand how, in our divorce-equals-all-hell-breaks-loose culture, it would be hard to imagine that Mike’s decision to live around the corner had nothing to do with me and everything to do with his wanting to be close to the girls and to help in terms of transitions and their coping with our divorce. 

Ultimately, none of those guys made it to the lightning round of dating me, but the reason never had anything to do with Mike living around the corner.  So I can’t say if that would ever have been a dealbreaker in my new relationship.  When I met my now-husband, he responded very positively to how I described my relationship with Mike, in large part because he had once envisioned a peaceful divorce and co-parenting situation for himself and his daughters, but it was not to be.  He thought it was great that we got along.  We had only known each other for a brief time before Christmas rolled around, and he didn’t blink.  The following spring, when Mike and I took the girls away during Spring Break, he still didn’t blink.  But these were not the traits that made me say, “This is the guy for me.”  Of course, I liked that he wasn’t suspicious of my interactions with Mike, but I never viewed my co-parenting arrangement as a litmus test or dealbreaker.  Honestly, it didn’t occur to me that my co-parenting arrangement would be an issue for a future partner, or something to be managed or negotiated.  I know that it is for a lot of co-parents, and understandably so, but that wasn’t my experience.  As for whether a parent “should” negotiate or change their arrangement to suit a new partner/spouse, I believe that’s a personal decision that depends on the circumstances.  I don’t believe there’s one right answer. 

Kela: The mission of co-parenting 101 is to teach divorced parents how to have healthy co-parenting relationships. What does that mean to you?

Deesha: It means striving to keep parental conflict to a minimum and interacting with your child’s other parent in ways that are civil and respectful and that recognize the other parent’s worth in the child’s eyes.

Kela: The fact of the matter is that there are tons of ex-wives who are antagonistic, bitter and intrusive. By that same token, there are tons of ex-husbands who are deadbeats. There are tons of stepfamilies of which the personalities of the parents/step-parents just clash. As such, these types of divorced parents and step-parents probably won’t be vacationing, or having Christmas dinner together. What is your advice for them?

Deesha:  Keep parental conflict to a minimum, interact with your child’s other parent in ways that are civil and respectful and that recognize the other parent’s worth in the child’s eyes.  The reality is, of course, bitter and/or deadbeats usually ignore such advice.  So our advice is for the parents struggling to deal with them: Do what you can to keep the peace anyway.  Don’t bad-mouth your ex; you really can affirm your child’s feelings (hurts, disappointments, etc.) without bad-mouthing the other parent. 

Be encouraged: Your love, positivity, and stability really does matter to your child, even though this may not be apparent in the short run.  

Keep your focus on your child, not the other parent.  Attack the problems that come up, not the other parent.  If your co-parent sends you an angry email blaming you for your child’s poor hygiene, for example, deal with the hygiene problem directly with your child.  You might not even respond to the email.  Respond, don’t react to your ex’s vitriol-there’s a huge difference. 

You can’t control or force this other person to change; all you can do is change your responses and control yourself.  Conduct yourself in such a way that you model civility, respect, and peace for your child (which, by the way, is not the same thing as being a doormat). 

Finally, look ahead: In 10, 20, 30 years from now, when your child is an adult, what would you like him/her to say about how you co-parented?  “My parents hated each other, and I felt trapped in the middle”? or “My parents didn’t get along, but my mom/dad worked really hard to keep me out of the middle”? 

Same advice for parents/stepparents: You don’t have to be friends.  If need be, steer clear of each other.  Just don’t say or do things that would make a child feel conflicted about the other person, or feel that she has to choose sides, declare loyalty. Be the bigger person in the face of negativity; be who the child needs you to be…again, not a doormat, but a peacekeeper.  If that means not engaging the other person, disengage to the extent that you can.

None of this is easy, and some parents/stepparents stay spoiling for a fight, but kids are worth the effort at least.

Share

Interview Series with Dynamic Modern Mamas

womenlaughI love talking to other moms and stepmoms. I like discussing how they make it work with their co-parents or spouses. I love discussing parenting tips. I love talking about sex and health and beauty tips. Women are full of insight and I love learning from the many different perspectives that we can have on just one issue. 

Now you can have a chance to hear our conversations, too as I publish a series of interviews with women like Deesha Philyaw from Co-Parenting 101; Jenn Mangino from Rockstar Co-Parenting; Chick Hughes, a psychologist who often writes about relationships, sex and sometimes family; Nichole Cruz, a divorced mom and fitness expert and more!  I’m so excited to allow you to be a fly on the wall as we discuss everything from sex, co-parenting, divorce, parenting, fitness and marriage.

Our interview series will  begin next week. Be sure to stop by to have a look and/or to leave a comment, or ask a question of any one of these dynamic modern mamas! I asked the tough questions and they were candid about their experiences. You definitely won’t want to miss this!

Share

His No Drama Mama by Chick Hughes

The following was written by guest blogger, Chick Hughes

conflictToo much emotion.  Too soon devotion.  Too many tears.  Unfounded fears.  When verbalized, all synonymous with drama in the eyes of the all-American male.  Men love many things…a hot curvaceous girl invitingly shooting him come-hither eyes, a winning touchdown seconds before a game’s end, freaky uninhibited sex in…well, anywhere…location doesn’t really concern them,  a thick juicy steak big enough to consume the plate it’s served on…just to name a few.  Any combination of which will render him putty in her hands.  But one sure fire way to callously jerk him from his state of euphoric bliss is to throw a little DRAMA his way!  Men infamously hate drama…and, of course, women cannot seem to exist without it.  I once read a one-liner from a man that summed up how he claimed men feel about drama.  In reference to a particular girlfriend of his, he wrote “The juice wasn’t worth the squeezing.”   Wow, that says a lot, does it not?  Too much juice on her end and not enough thirst on his.  Men and women have so much to learn about one another…but in order to learn and enjoy the “juice,” he has to take the time to squeeze.  Otherwise, he’ll have so many different flavors of “juice” on his palate, his mouth will be in a permanent state of sour- induced contorted twists.  And, walking around with a face like that,  his “juice” problems will be all dried up.

Why do men hate drama?

To a man, a woman who is verbalizing her feelings in depth and dwelling on them is creating drama.  He hates drama because he doesn’t understand it.  Men don’t verbalize problems or feelings.  They internalize…go into their mental cave to fix the problem.  And if she tries to force her pretty little only-trying-to-help head into that cave, she’ll likely lose it.  WARNING:  NO interruptions while the “fixing” process is underway.  He’s a problem-solver, not a detail thinker.  If she complains, cries, or presents him with a problem, he immediately puts on his fix-it hat.  He feels he needs to determine the problem, triangulate a solution, and put that solution into motion…then, and only then, in his mind, has he done his job, protected his woman, and made her happy.  This is his way of showing his love for her.  But, too many emotional details cloud his plan of action and only frustrate him…however he forges on.  Once he’s zeroed in on and offered a solution, she gets angry.  He’s confused…she had a problem, he solved it, but she’s still angry?  He’s not sure what she wants from him.  Both have hit a dead end.  Let the fighting begin.  After going a few rounds, he realizes that he doesn’t know how to fix the problem because she won’t allow him to.  She’s just tied his hands behind his back while spoon feeding him a steady stream of drama that he doesn’t know how to digest…eventually he’ll get full and spit it back at her, walk away, and distance himself from the perceived problem.  If he’s not allowed to fix it, he feels like a failure.  If a man is made to feel like a failure, he pulls back.  If he pulls back, she assumes he doesn’t care.  Result:  more DRAMA…more pulling back…more drama…more pulling back…disconnect.  Tip for men:  Listen, don’t fix.  Determining the “whys to her cries” without attempting the fix may just turn those cries into bedroom surprise.

Why do women create drama?

Some have theorized that women create drama in an unconscious attempt to put a man on the spot and find out his emotional strengths and weaknesses…in essence, judge him on how he handles emotional situations…is he a listener?  encouraging?  patient?  selfish?  empathetic?  supportive?  It’s hypothesized that this “test” acts as gauge as to what her future may be like with him.  While this is not a scientific theory,  it’s a theory that very much intrigues me.  By nature, we strive to find the best suitable mate for ourselves AND the best possible father for our children.  His emotional gauge is vital information to this search.  A way of eliminating the “bad eggs” and revealing the “golden egg.”

 Some scientists claim that a woman who creates an excessive amount of drama and displays needy or clingy behavior was likely the child of neglectful parenting…that the child was accustomed to begging for love and attention and is, therefore, conditioned to think drama is the only way of achieving it.  Ironically, in the end, that drama will only achieve the opposite, as she’ll suffocate any man who attempts to love her.  Fan a flame, you see light.  Suffocate it, you see nothing.

Cold hard truth?  Women are emotional beings.  Emotional all of the time, yes.  More emotional once a month, absolutely.  You can bet…she hates her monthly friend more than he does.   He may be held captive and forced to watch the hormonal sideshow starring the two-headed,  flame-eating woman… but she’s the one tied up emotionally and taken hostage by her alter ego freakshow only to later wonder… “Who the hell was that?”  But that’s just once a month…best advice…lower your head and NEVER, ever look her in the eye, as it’s seen as a challenge.  And going up against two heads spitting fire cannot end well. She shares her feelings, emotions, and problems not because she wants him to “fix” them.  She shares them to establish and nourish relationships.  She shares them because  she loves him, because she wants to bond with him, because she needs to feel that he understands her.  It’s just that simple.  She’s not looking for a solution.  She doesn’t want, or need, him to fix her problem.  If she does, she’ll ask.  Otherwise, she only wants him to listen.  She wants him to validate her feelings and empathize with her.  She wants him to be quiet, listen…and say “I know.  You’re right.  I can totally see why you would feel that way.  Is there anything I can do?”  Validation…check.  Empathy…check.  This response will calm her,  reinstate him as her rock, and make her fall in love with him all over again.  Soon her meltdown will begin to solidify.  Once it does, she’ll be equipped to move on, get over it, and possibly get it on.  Emotion (hers, not his)  followed by sex is the ultimate connector.  With the almighty power of this combo, not only is he her emotional rock…he’s her sexual Hercules

Men must realize that women and drama go hand in hand…understand this, accept it, and learn how to respond in a way that will make her respond.  Cutting off her emotional sharing will in turn cut off her connection to you.  Keep all connecting roads open…and you will find many short cuts to the destination of your sexual choice.  Women must realize that sometimes we overdo the drama. While it’s a necessary evil with us, too much “evil” will wear down the devil himself.  Keep the emotional sharing on a short leash.  Too much running rampant will result in piles of crap everywhere.  And if he’s not allowed to clean it up, he may leave the park.

 Realistically, it’s not within a woman’s grasp to attain No-Drama mama status.  But, with a little understanding and effort, she can totally rock his world as his Low-Drama mama.

 

chickhughessmChick Hughes is a wife of 15 years, mother of 2, and lover of psychology. She holds a B.S. in Psychology and offers insight, advice, and humor on relationships, sex, and family.  She has extensive experience with children, but now stays home with  her own children, Patrick (9) and Anna (3), who both delight and challenge her daily. You can visit her website at http://chickhughes.com/ to read more of her work.  Or you can visit her fan page on Facebook, Chick Hughes, where you can participate in discussions relating to her current topic.

Share

National Stepfamily Day!

To all my modern stepfamilies, today is National Stepfamily Day!

familyblend1

Today is a day for celebration of the things that are going right instead of dwelling on everything that’s wrong with your stepfamily.  It’s a day to forget the challenges and recognize the blessings. It’s a day to do away with all the negativity and focus on the positive. It’s a day to celebrate the fact that you made it this far! How do you plan to celebrate today?

Share

Trendy Kids

Having children is the best feeling in the world (so I’ve heard)! I don’t have children yet so I can’t say that I know the feeling but I know how fun it is to get them dressed. I have nephews and God-daughters and I absolutely love shopping for them. It’s funny to me because they all have their own unique style and like to pick their own clothes.

This picture of the Jolie-Pitt kiddos (below) made me laugh because it reminded me of how different my nephews and God-daughters are with their style. My oldest nephew (11) is preppy and likes to wear polo shirts and slacks while my youngest nephew (6) is more into trying to dress like Michael Jackson.

joliepittkids

Jolie-Pitt Kids

I think it’s important to let your children have a little say in what they wear. It’s part of expressing themselves and coming into their own. Granted we don’t want the kids to have too much say so a good start would be to pick out a few choices and let them decide from what you’ve selected. Doing so will encourage and support their individuality without going overboard. I look at Angelina’s kids and they are definitely individuals. Zahara (5) is a girly girl in her cardigan and shorts while Shiloh (4) is more of a tomboy and prefers to only wear boy clothes (I won’t get into that). Maddox (9) has the surfer look and young Pax (6) is dressed like a little man. Check out the pieces below that will fit into your budget and keep your little ones stylish.

rebeltee

Crazy 8's $4.99

boyscardigan

Crazy 8's $13.99

boysdenim

Gap $19.99

denimruffleshirt

Gap $28.50

plaiddress

Crazy 8's $24.75

blackgymboreedress

Gymboree $20.83

Share

There is No Magic Formula Stepmoms

teensdivorcedatingI’ve had the pleasure of talking to many many stepmoms over the years and what I realized is that most of them desired some magic formula for acceptance; either that, or they were confusing the definition of the word altogether. Most wanted to know that if they love and support their husband and be the best stepmom they can be to their stepkids, then they will be truly loved and accepted by their stepchildren. Their constant need to be accepted loved by everyone consumes them to the point that they forget that they must focus on other components of their overall family in order to be a successful stepfamily and yes, you can be considered a successful stepfamily even if the stepkids don’t like you.

What stepmoms must realize is that it will take much more than just being like Carol Brady to get the stepchildren to like you. Often times, your actions aren’t even the deciding factor at all. What has to happen first is mom/ex-wife has to free her children to love. She has to let go of any hurt or apprehension regarding her ex-spouse’s remarriage and having another maternal figure in her children’s lives. She has to be free from allowing her negative emotions to influence her children’s decision to accept you. No matter how subtly, she cannot imply that she will feel betrayed if her children actually like dad’s wife. She has to stop perceiving you as some sort of threat before any of this can happen. So as you can see, it really doesn’t matter how loving, caring, kind or compassionate you are as an ex-wife/mom’s negative feelings has much less to do with you and more about her own internal struggle.

Next, what has to happen is that dad has to be free of guilt parenting and committed to the both of you putting forth that unified front for his kids.  Doing so, will show his kids that the evil villian (you) did not make dad her puppeter, but instead, he is actually committed to being her parnter. This will send the message to the kids that there is no point in trying to break up the union, so you might as well get on board and do your part to make the stepfamily work. When children realize that their divide and conquer strategies won’t work, they usually concede. This doesn’t necessarily mean that they will like you, however, but they will respect you.

This doesn’t mean, however, that you should completely give up. It just means that you have to change your perspective regarding what makes a successful stepfamily and how you go about achieving that. Most stepmothers think that you have achieved success when the kids are finally in love with you and this is simply not the case. Very rarely does a stepfamily operate like a first family, so if you have this goal in mind from the start, you are doomed to fail. Instead of forcing your way through the children, continuously work on your marriage. What I’ve discovered is that a stepfamily can be stable if the ex-wife/mom or even the kids don’t like you, but your stepfamily will fail if you and your spouse aren’t in sync.  A more realistic goal is to work in an area where you already are accepted and that’s with your spouse. Constantly work on communication and dating your spouse; things that first marriages even have to work on. Build a union that is based on common goals, trust and mutual understanding and then present this model to your stepchildren, through example.  Develop a co-parenting plan that consist of house rules and consequences that you both agree upon and present this to your children, as a unified front. Doing the aforementioned will allow you to build a stepfamily based on respect, which will increase  your chances of eventually building trust as a family, instead of feeling like you have to bear the task alone.

It’s all about changing your focus, stepmoms; realizing that your stepkids don’t have to like you, but they have to respect you in order to make your stepfamily work. Kids need order and consistency to feel safe in a world that has just become so unpredictable for them. Developing a co-parenting plan, a consistent routine and a family mission statement that you all agree upon is a much better formula for success.

Share

An Interview with Chef Tony

tonyaward

Antonio Accepting Award

On Saturday, April 24th, 2010, Antonio Thomas entered his first cooking competition at Le Cordon Bleu Culinary Academy and won 2nd Place, landing him a Chef’s hat and coat, a professional kitchen knife, a $125 gift certificate for cookbooks, and a $2,000 scholarship towards his culinary education.

When asked why he decided to become a chef, Antonio responded, “I know what it’s like to be hungry. When I become a chef and open my restaurant I can use part on my earnings to feed the homeless and make sure families don’t go hungry. I’ve always helped my mom by making lunch and helping with dinner. It was amazing how she would make something out of nothing and make it taste good.”

 I had the privilege of chatting with an amazing young man a couple of weeks ago. In the interview below, Tony shares his insight regarding his love for cooking as well as growing up in a single parent home (at one point) and a stepfamily.   The lessons we learn from kids who are in the trenches, living the modern family lifestyle everyday, is absolutely incredible. I learned so much from this young man as his wisdom far exceeds his age.  I also picked up some cooking tips from the young chef.

 Diane: What are the most important items one should always have in their home pantry?

 Tony: Salt, sugar, flour, wine, and oil,  

Diane:  I love to incorporate spice in my cooking.  What 5 spices should I never go without in my kitchen and which one do you think is often the most misunderstood?

Tony:     Salt, pepper, garlic, paprika, and onion powder. Most meals begin with these basic ingredients.

Diane: Coming from being raised by a single-mom, what began your interest in the culinary field?  Was it from watching and admiring her in the kitchen? 

Tony: No matter what we had in the kitchen she always made something out of nothing.  I would look in the fridge and the cabinets and see nothing to eat.  Then she would come home and whip up a meal out of whatever we had and It always tasted great!

  Diane: Cooking is one of my personal passions as well.   I get a huge release and relaxation from creating in the kitchen.  I try to recreate the stories of my life through my food (i.e., dishes my grandmother made by going through her old marked-up cookbooks, etc.).  Sounds corney, huh?  Tell me what inspires your cooking.

Tony: My inspiration for cooking comes from creating dishes and watching others enjoy my food.

Diane: I grew up in a single-parent household as well.  I remember that my mother used to call me in from playing a few nights out of the week and try to get me to watch her cook because she felt it was important for a young girl to learn this skill.  Did your mother do the same with you?

 Tony: Yeah, I always stay up with her on holidays and watch her cook.  She would have all four burners going.  She’d be cleaning the greens and making my favorite ‘stuffing balls’ and I would watch her cook and clean up as she went along.  Then she would place this fabulous feast on the table and I would remember that all this food was once groceries that I had just put up.

Kela: What is your definition of family?

 Tony: No matter what we went through my mother always showed me that she loved me.  It made the tough times not so tough and I love her for that.  So my definition would be – LOVE

Kela:  Will you share any words of encouragement for other children who are being raised by a single mother or are in a stepfamily situation?

Tony: Do your part to make it work.  Being the oldest I have had a few step dads.  Some were great, some were pretty cool, and some just didn’t work out.  I learned that it take the parents and the children to make the step family thing work.  If everyone does their part to make the house a loving home it will work.  There will be misunderstandings and everyone won’t always agree, but if everyone at least tries to understand where others are coming from, everything will be just fine just fine just fine whew!) in my Mary J Blige voice

  Kela: What’s next for you – after culinary school?

Tony: I plan to open my own restaurant.  A high end restaurant that will serve fine dining and all the left over food will be served to homeless families at my mom’s shelter. Because it will keep me grounded so that I will never forget where I came from.

Share

Are Step-Parents Real Parents?

stepmomdaugh

In doing some recent research about the relationships step-parents share with their step-children, I was refreshed with an article I read a while back, a few years after first becoming a stepmom.   The article begged a post here on Todays Modern Family not just because of its relevancy, but because of the importance it holds not just for step-parents facing this issue, but for gay and lesbian couples as well.  I recently experienced such an experience with my step-daughter and I just had to post this article in its entirety for our readers.  I would love to hear your thoughts and opinions regarding same.

Are Step-Parents Real Parents:  Published by Time Magazine (Circa 2006)

This week the Supreme Court let stand a ruling that ultimately could affect as many as one-third of all Americans – anyone in a stepfamily.  But you’ll probably never realize it from any news reports on the ruling.

The case comes out of Washington State. Sue Carvin and Page Britain were lesbians living together since 1989. Their baby, L., was born in 1995, using an at-home artificial insemination kit and some sperm donated from their gay friend. Page Britain carried L. and gave birth, but Sue Carvin became the stay-at-home mom while Page worked to support the family. Their child called Sue “Mama” and Page “Mommy.”

For several years they were a model of lesbian co-parenting. But Page grew upset that Sue didn’t earn much money, and Sue was hurt that Page didn’t recognize the value of her sacrifice. They split up when L. was seven years old. Ever since, they’ve been fighting for custody in the courts. Or sort of. Because the courts couldn’t agree on whether Sue Carvin even had the right to fight for custody. She nurtured the child, but she wasn’t the biological mother. So what was she, in the eyes of the law?

Washington State decided that Sue Carvin has the right to argue she’s a “de facto” parent. This new classification can apply to any non-biological parental figure – and it specifically mentions stepparents. So while the case appears on first glance to be about gay-and-lesbian rights, it may have a far broader impact.

Consider that for every 1,000 couples with children in the United States, only two of those couples are same-sex-oriented. Meanwhile, thanks to the huge number of second marriages, a third of all Americans are part of a stepfamily. The question “Are they real parents?” applies not just to gays and lesbians – it applies to every stepfamily. That’s what the kids are testing when they angrily scream, “You’re not my real mommy!” And when the biological mother hears that her son has been spanked by his stepmother, she wonders, “She can’t do that, can she?”

While we closely monitor how gay rights are granted and taken away, we pay almost no attention to the fact that stepparents are in the same legal limbo. Despite being ubiquitous, step-relationships are rarely recognized by the law. In most states, stepparents are considered “legal strangers” even if they have cared for and supported a stepchild for years. They have almost no official responsibility and barely any rights.

What kind of rights are they deprived of? Some are remarkably banal. For instance a stepparent can’t sign a child’s school report card or field-trip permission form. Others are significant. A stepfather can’t include his stepdaughter on his family health insurance plan, for example. And she can’t inherit from him when he dies.

In the last few years, state family courts have tried to accommodate the stepparents and stepchildren who appear before them, without granting so much that it subtracts rights from a biological parent. In Colorado a stepparent can now sign the form that allows a minor to apply for a driver’s license. And in Oregon, a stepparent can petition the courts for visitation of former stepchildren, if that marriage has ended. In Arkansas, it’s even theoretically possible now for a stepparent to win custody over a biological parent. But in each state it’s a different story, and many states are still in denial.

So a stepmother can take a month off work to care for her sick stepson, thanks to the federal law on Family Leave. But if she has to take her stepson to the emergency room, state law might prevent her from authorizing medical treatment. And if her son ends up dying due to hospital negligence, she can’t sue.

The legal field is sitting on a huge time bomb. One-third of Americans are just one unfortunate circumstance away from ending up in court demanding their rights – where they will be told that those relationships aren’t real, and don’t count.

The U.S. Supreme Court has never been pressed to rule whether a stepparent is a real parent, and if so, under what conditions. But when it declined to review Britain v. Carvin, Washington State’s test for “de facto” parents instantly became a model for other states to replicate. Through a case everyone thought was about gay rights, stepfamilies just opened the door to the recognition they truly deserve.

Over the next 10 years, there will be an explosion of cases testing just how “real” stepparents are. This will never get the attention surrounding same-sex cases, because stepfamilies are just as populous in red states as blue, and no politician can use it to their advantage. Nor are stepfamilies subjected to the same degree of prejudice. Stepparents might be vilified, but they are vilified one at a time – not as a class. However, the systematic bias against them is very real.

Just as the law prefers parents to be one male and one female, the law prefers to limit the number of parents to two. Maybe this is because two is the number of people it takes to make a child in the first place. Maybe it’s because all the government forms are already printed with two signature lines. Maybe it’s because two worked so well for us for so long. But that hasn’t been the reality for several decades, and it’s time for the law to catch up.

Give me your thoughts TMF readers, we would love to hear your opinions on this subject!

You can read the full article at:

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1195205,00.html#ixzz0yHi6btPl

Share